Close Menu
Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    • Earth
    • Economics
    • Environment
      • Environmental Tech
      • Pollution
      • Wildlife
    • Health
      • Health Tech
      • Medicine
      • Nutrition
      • Exercise
    • History
      • Prehistory
      • Ancient History
      • Postclassical Era
      • Modern History
    • Humans
      • Human Brain
      • Psychology
    • Life
      • Animals & Plants
      • Genetics
      • Paleontology
      • Evolution
      • Genetic Engineering
    • Physics
    • Space
      • Astrobiology
      • Astronomy
      • Extrasolar Planets
      • Space Tech
      • Spaceflight
    • Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Energy
      • Engineering
      • Materials
      • Robotics
      • Vehicles
    Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    Home » “Missing” Wallets with More Cash Are More Likely to Be Returned
    Economics

    “Missing” Wallets with More Cash Are More Likely to Be Returned

    July 8, 20193 Mins Read
    Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
    Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
    Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

    Classical economic theories suggest that the greater the temptation, the less likely we are to be honest — but a new study turns the idea on its head, finding that altruism and a powerful aversion to viewing oneself as a ‘thief’ outweigh the financial incentives to cheat.

    According to the study published in the Journal of Science, honesty increased as the incentive to cheat (higher wallet value) increased.

    In the study that involved 355 cities in 40 countries and over 17,000 wallets, researchers turned in supposedly lost wallets with no money, nominal amount money, or a substantial amount of money to people in reception areas in various public buildings.

    Research participants pretended to have found a lost wallet and quickly handed it into hotels, museums, post offices, banks or police stations and then quickly left.

    They found that a majority of people returned the wallets and – contrary to classic economic logic – they were more likely to do so the more money the wallet contained.

    The experiment, which cost $600,000, is unparalleled in its magnitude.

    “We mistakenly assume that our fellow human beings are selfish,”

    “In reality, their self-image as an honest person is more important to them than a short-term monetary gain.”

    – Alain Cohn, an assistant professor of economics at the University of Michigan and first author of the study.

    Overall across the globe, 51 percent of those who were handed a wallet with the smaller amount of money reported it. When the wallet contained a large sum of money, the rate of return increased to 72 percent.

    Some wallets contained the equivalent of $13.45, adjusted for purchasing power in the target country but in three countries (the US, UK, and Poland), the researchers repeated the experiment with $94.15, which boosted reporting rates by an average of 11 percentage points. They also found that having a door key in the wallet boosted reporting rates by 9.2 percentage points in the three countries.

    The team’s experiments were mostly meant to study and establish a method to measure civic honesty, the authors said. The fact that regular people and even experts were off base with their cynical predictions may have broader implications, however.

    The authors hope that increasing awareness of the negative impact people’s behavior has on others might increase honesty — so by policy to make it more difficult for people to persuade themselves that they are honest when they do something wrong.

    Reference:

    Alain Cohn et al “Civic honesty around the globe“, Science 20 June 2019.10.1126 / science.aau8712 (2019))

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    The Strait of Hormuz Dilemma: Power, Energy, and an Irreversible Turning Point

    March 27, 2026

    Oil Shocks, Policy Mistakes, and the Risk of a Second Inflation Wave (Part II)

    March 4, 2026

    Oil Shocks, Policy Mistakes, and the Risk of a Second Inflation Wave (Part I)

    March 3, 2026

    AI, Automatic Stabilizers & Inflation

    February 15, 2026

    The Day the Alliance Died

    January 5, 2026

    What Would Happen If China Attacked Taiwan?

    December 23, 2025
    Recent Posts
    • The Strait of Hormuz Dilemma: Power, Energy, and an Irreversible Turning Point
    • Eggs, Cholesterol, and Heart Disease: What the Science Actually Says in 2026
    • Oil Shocks, Policy Mistakes, and the Risk of a Second Inflation Wave (Part II)
    • Oil Shocks, Policy Mistakes, and the Risk of a Second Inflation Wave (Part I)
    • Microsoft Stored a Movie on Glass — And It Could Last Centuries
    • AI, Automatic Stabilizers & Inflation
    • Largest Battles in History: Cannae — Rome’s Darkest Day
    • The Day the Alliance Died
    • Evaluating Heart Disease: How Cumulative Diet Choices Compound Your Risk
    • What Would Happen If China Attacked Taiwan?
    © 2025 Illustrated Curiosity

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.