Close Menu
Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram YouTube
    Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    • Earth
    • Economics
    • Environment
      • Environmental Tech
      • Pollution
      • Wildlife
    • Health
      • Health Tech
      • Medicine
      • Nutrition
      • Exercise
    • History
      • Prehistory
      • Ancient History
      • Postclassical Era
      • Modern History
    • Humans
      • Human Brain
      • Psychology
    • Life
      • Animals & Plants
      • Genetics
      • Paleontology
      • Evolution
      • Genetic Engineering
    • Physics
    • Space
      • Astrobiology
      • Astronomy
      • Extrasolar Planets
      • Space Tech
      • Spaceflight
    • Technology
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Energy
      • Engineering
      • Materials
      • Robotics
      • Vehicles
    Illustrated Curiosity | Economics, History, Science, Space, Technology, Health, Physics, Earth
    Home » Direct Action: Carbon Capture Gears up for Climate Battle
    Energy

    Direct Action: Carbon Capture Gears up for Climate Battle

    June 24, 20193 Mins Read
    Pixabay
    Pixabay
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Carbon capture and storage technology might prove necessary to deal with global warming.

    Humans first started burning fossil fuels on an industrial scale in the late 19th century, when Earth’s atmosphere contained about 280ppm of CO2. The intervening years have seen that concentration rise above 410ppm, alongside a corresponding global average temperature increase of more than 1°C.

    Despite decades of warnings from climate scientists, the world is still struggling to cut down its CO2 emissions, and a handful of researchers and private companies are now trying to fill in some of the gaps with an idea that was once considered fringe: capturing carbon.

    In Switzerland, a company has developed carbon dioxide collectors that can absorb relatively large amounts of CO2 from the air. On the roof of a large waste facility in Hinwil, close to Zurich, there are large constructions with funnels. These suck in air and then filter the carbon dioxide out of the air. Heat and energy come from the waste incineration from the plant below. Every collector can handle 50 tons of carbon dioxide a year, according to the Communications Manager Louise Charles at the company Climeworks.

     

     

    According to the International Energy Council, last year, just over 33 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide were added to energy-related emissions. The UN Climate Panel IPCC has previously said that in this century, we will have to remove about 10 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere for temperatures to stabilize on a two-stage increase.

    The 50 tons in Hinwil are only a minimal fraction of global CO2 concentrations and not even near the total quantities that would be needed. Millions of these collectors would be needed to take care of 10 billion tons of CO2. But the technological development is progressing and making good strides.

    Some ten years ago, it was only possible to collect a few milligrams a day in a laboratory setting. Now the big challenge is to increase capacity so that carbon capture becomes a meaningful and relevant action in the battle against global warming. There are several similar facilities in Germany, Canada, the USA, and Iceland. The Icelandic has the opportunity to bury the carbon dioxide, for geological reasons.

    The Icelandic bedrock is basalt, and it undergoes a chemical reaction between basalt and the carbon dioxide’s “bubble water”, it becomes stone, and then almost nothing is released back into the atmosphere. In Hinwil, on the other hand, the cycle continues. Captured carbon dioxide is sold to different users. The greenhouses in the area use fertilizers made with carbon dioxide, the soft drink industry buys a lot, and another part is used for the synthesis of renewable fuels. But economically, the incentives aren’t there yet, as the business isn’t profitable.

    But according to Louise Charles, the business would be profitable if it was possible to bring the price below $ 100 per ton of captured carbon dioxide.

    Carbon Capture
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email Copy Link

    Related Posts

    A Fusion Energy Breakthrough? Major Announcement Expected From US Scientists

    December 12, 2022

    New Efficiency Record for Transparent Solar Cells

    August 26, 2020

    IBM’s Lithium Battery Uses Seawater Materials Instead of Heavy Metals

    May 31, 2020

    Demand for batteries will increase tenfold

    May 20, 2020

    Samsung Unveils Groundbreaking All-solid-state Battery Technology

    May 5, 2020

    Unveiling the Future of Energy: Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)

    January 27, 2020
    Recent Posts
    • The Day the Alliance Died
    • Evaluating Heart Disease: How Cumulative Diet Choices Compound Your Risk
    • What Would Happen If China Attacked Taiwan?
    • Geopoliticisation as a Structural Tailwind for Commodity Prices
    • America’s Economic Remodel: Who’s Really Paying the Bill?
    • Why Inflation May Be Preparing for a Second Act
    • How the End of Bretton Woods Reshaped Our Economies — and Our Politics
    • Can the U.S. Really Handle 250% Debt-to-GDP? Why Jackson Hole’s Daring Paper Is Wrong
    • Japan’s Fiscal Trap: What Happens If Austerity Is No Longer an Option?
    • The Rise of Range Extended Electric Vehicles (REEVs): A New Era of Hybrid Mobility
    © 2025 Illustrated Curiosity

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.